| Were back | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
vic
Posts : 5 Join date : 2009-09-20
| Subject: Were back Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:13 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
tool
Posts : 537 Join date : 2009-08-13 Age : 34 Location : California
| Subject: Re: Were back Sun Sep 20, 2009 4:00 pm | |
| ww3 fails, no offense. It's just a bad setup, and hardly anyone participates really. | |
|
| |
titan
Posts : 437 Join date : 2009-08-14
| Subject: Re: Were back Sun Sep 20, 2009 4:15 pm | |
| voted awctf.. it will fail though | |
|
| |
titan
Posts : 437 Join date : 2009-08-14
| Subject: Re: Were back Sun Sep 20, 2009 4:16 pm | |
| vic if you end up doing awctf ill help you plan it.. if you want me lol | |
|
| |
vic
Posts : 5 Join date : 2009-09-20
| Subject: Re: Were back Sun Sep 20, 2009 6:38 pm | |
| i think this is gonna be a/w CTF people are wanting it. | |
|
| |
rifle
Posts : 126 Join date : 2009-08-19
| Subject: Re: Were back Sun Sep 20, 2009 7:40 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
tool
Posts : 537 Join date : 2009-08-13 Age : 34 Location : California
| Subject: Re: Were back Sun Sep 20, 2009 8:28 pm | |
| you can host it at |rps| server if it's a/w ctf. We already have a damn good cfg (thanks to kevin, who knows all about cfgs ) and our server is pretty much known as the only good a/w ctf server I guess. So it'd make sense. Plus we might as well get some use out of it. | |
|
| |
vic
Posts : 5 Join date : 2009-09-20
| Subject: Re: Were back Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:10 pm | |
| Yea we will see I will end the poll Wend. | |
|
| |
Anthem
Posts : 268 Join date : 2009-08-13 Age : 31 Location : Ohio
| Subject: Re: Were back Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:36 am | |
| - tool wrote:
- you can host it at |rps| server if it's a/w ctf. We already have a damn good cfg (thanks to kevin, who knows all about cfgs ) and our server is pretty much known as the only good a/w ctf server I guess. So it'd make sense. Plus we might as well get some use out of it.
Titan and I sorta discussed this already... we decided it would be best not to host the tournament because if it fails then our server will be known as the failed tournament server. Also, for the time being, it is my decision as to whether or not the server does anything new. I am, however, able to be influenced by titan and tool. | |
|
| |
tool
Posts : 537 Join date : 2009-08-13 Age : 34 Location : California
| Subject: Re: Were back Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:14 am | |
| true that. We should watch a few games before we decide if it will actually pull through. But if it does, it could be beneficial to both of us. | |
|
| |
titan
Posts : 437 Join date : 2009-08-14
| Subject: Re: Were back Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:16 am | |
| pugs are fine for the most part but when you add any competition into 1.16 people can't handle it hence the 100% fail rate of every tourney prety sad really | |
|
| |
tool
Posts : 537 Join date : 2009-08-13 Age : 34 Location : California
| Subject: Re: Were back Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:20 am | |
| I dunno, I thought HMP 1.0 was actually better than most tournies | |
|
| |
DGK
Posts : 223 Join date : 2009-08-13 Age : 34
| Subject: Re: Were back Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:46 am | |
| - titan wrote:
- pugs are fine for the most part but when you add any competition into 1.16 people can't handle it hence the 100% fail rate of every tourney prety sad really
I agree because they allow peopel to enter at any time which shouldnt be allowed also the fact that everyone whop loses will blame it on the weapon damages etc | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Were back | |
| |
|
| |
| Were back | |
|